The Racism Dance
As the racist rhetoric oozes from Republican presidential
candidates, why are comments contained in Ron Paul newsletters from the
1980s and 1990s being widely considered more offensive than current
bigoted banter uttered by Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum?
One answer to that question is a politics where partisan criticisms
are directed at crippling certain candidates feared as rising stars.
Thus when Congressman Paul began percolating up in the Iowa Caucus
polls late last year, news of his caustic comments in those decades-old
newsletters became headline news coverage.
Curiously for a candidate tagged racist Paul has a public record of
opposing the most racist governmental offensive in contemporary America –
the War on Drugs – that societally destructive campaign other GOP
presidential candidates ignore.
The Drug War’s documented race-tainted enforcement practices drives
facts like blacks comprising 25% of Iowa’s state prison population
despite blacks there representing just 2.9% of that state’s population.
Another answer to that question of why Ron not Rick or Newt lies embedded in
America’s historic refusal to earnestly address racism especially pernicious institutional racism.
America’s historic refusal to earnestly address racism especially pernicious institutional racism.
Dancing around racism, individual and institutional, is as American as apple pie.
Typical of the disingenuousness entangling that dance, racist remarks
receive much ado while silence surrounds substantive issues like the
unearned privileges arising from institutional racism that have aided
the lives and careers of each of the GOP presidential contenders.
Former Pennsylvania U.S. Senator Rick Santorum, for example, enjoyed a
comfortable middle class upbringing after his 1958 birth because both
of his parents worked as medical professionals at Veterans
Administration hospitals.
The VA along with other governmental and private sector employers
openly discriminated against qualified black professionals until the
late-1960s/early-1970s thus limiting blacks from income to improve their
families.
Conservatives rarely if ever acknowledge the unearned benefits
flowing to whites (especially those in the middle and upper classes)
from America’s decades-long reign of legalized segregation.
“Racism is a tenacious evil,” civil rights icon Dr. Martin Luther
King Jr. stated in a 1967 article published nine months before his
assassination. This King observation is applicable to the political
practice of candidates, mainly Republican, roiling race for electoral
advantage.
King, in that article, also reminded “millions of underprivileged
whites” of something they never hear from Republican GOP presidential
candidates: white supremacy “can feed” egos but not stomachs. That
factoid should resonate in today’s Recession ravished economy with high
unemployment and rising rates of poverty.
Congressman Paul’s opposition to the creation of the January national
holiday honoring Dr. King – a recognition Paul once castigated as hate
whites day – is among the current criticism leveled against his
presidential candidacy. Typical of America’s racism dance, Paul
soft-shoes that opposition to ride electoral boosting rails among
far-right-wing whites who still detest King.
There’s something unseemly about this ruckus over racist remarks playing out largely in America’s mainstream news media.
Much of the news media maintains segregated staffing practices just a
few steps better than the campaign staffs assembled by the GOP
presidential contenders where lack of diversity draws criticism from
some black Republicans.
While coverage of the Iowa Caucuses consumed tons of newsprint, hours
of broadcast time and data space on the internet mainstream news
coverage rarely referenced the regressive fact that Iowa is one of only
four states that permanently disenfranchises people with any felony
convictions.
This disenfranchisement disproportionately impacts blacks who
comprise 70% of the two million Americans nationwide permanently
excluded from the democratic right to vote. (Disenfranchisement measures
are rooted in racist laws against blacks approved in Deep South states
following the Civil War.)
Discriminatory enforcement practices evident in the Drug War
ensnaring innocent and guilty alike fuels the assembly line felony
convictions producing permanent disenfranchisement. Yet, candidates and
news coverage consign this abuse to ‘below-the-radar’ status.
In 1995 then GOP House Speak Newt Gingrich and then Democratic
President Bill Clinton collaborated to crush a U.S. Sentencing
Commission recommendation to end the racial abuses arising from federal
crack cocaine laws.
That Clinton-Gingrich crack law collaboration, scuttling an effort to
right race-tainted wrong, condemned thousands of non-whites to
incarceration that was both unnecessary and expensive. Historically,
bigotry in America is bi-partisan.
The saturation news coverage accorded the GOP presidential race
further minimizes needed examination of many race-tinged electoral
issues.
Those critical issues include the GOP’s nationwide vote suppression
onslaught against minorities, the elderly and students (all presumed
Democratic Party voters). A key weapon in that onslaught is enacting
laws requiring government issued photo IDs to vote.
South Carolina, the site for the next GOP presidential primary, is
expending state funds in an effort to beat back the U.S. Justice
Department’s blocking implementation of SC’s new photo ID voter law.
The USJD cites South Carolina’s own statistics showing that ID law
having damaging impacts on nearly 100,000 non-white voters as critical
to its decision to block implementation of SC’s law.
The USJD is empowered under Voting Rights Act oversight provisions to
block electoral measures that adversely impact minorities in South
Carolina and other states with histories of discriminatory practices.
The Republicans controlling South Carolina’s state government happily
spend taxpayer money to support voter suppression instead of using
those resources to reduce that state having some of the nation’s highest
levels of unemployment and rates of child poverty.
Current GOP presidential frontrunner Mitt Romney recently termed the
USJD’s protection of non-white voting rights in South Carolina a “very
serious error” when addressing a predominately white gathering while
campaigning in SC.
Neither Romney nor any of his GOP challengers, who endorse voter IDs
to reduce possible voter fraud, found fault with the Iowa Caucuses not
requiring any voter photo ID for participation.
Are Romney and his GOP presidential confederates contending
conservative whites are immune from attempting voter fraud by virtue of
their Republican registration and/or skin color?
A December 2011 NAACP report examining the GOP’s voter suppression
onslaught nationwide listed numerous statistics backing the finding that
evidence of voter fraud anywhere is historically lower than incidents
of people being struck by lightning.
Bigoted banter is nothing new from Gingrich, Paul and Santorum.
Remember Gingrich and Santorum were paid commentators for FOX News
before they began their presidential campaigns…the same FOX with a
rancid record of routine race-baiting.
Gingrich, during a campaign stop, declared that he was prepared to
attend the NAACP’s annual convention “to talk about why the
African-American community should demand paychecks and not be satisfied
with food stamps.”
Set aside for a moment that Gingrich has rejected past invitations
from the NAACP to address their annual convention and the fact that more
whites than blacks receive food stamps.
Gingrich, a man possessing a PhD and who taught history at a Georgia
college, should know a little something about the century’s long
struggle of blacks to obtain equitable opportunities to earn income.
A 1905 Declaration of Principles from a group whose leaders helped
found the NAACP four years later criticized “the denial of equal
opportunities to [blacks] in economic life” and stressed the duty of
blacks “to work.”
Gingrich’s campaign proclamation that blacks shun paychecks and
prefer receiving food stamps displays either disturbing ignorance or
intellectual dishonesty.
Ignorance and dishonesty should disqualify any candidate from the Oval Office.
But in Sarah Palin perpetrated GOP-speak of disparaging intellect
ignorance is now an electoral virtue. Palin popularized hating
intellectual ‘elitism’ embodied by the Harvard Law educated President
Obama.
Reveling in ignorance, Gingrich recently bashed opponent Mitt Romney for being bilingual – speaking French.
That Gingrich criticism is an embarrassing posture for an
ex-professor who should know the limits on America’s growth in the
global economy arising from America having one of the world’s lowest
levels of citizens fluent in other languages.
Santorum also slung race-tainted mud with campaign mutterings about
his desire to give blacks “the opportunity to go out and earn” money
instead of his making the lives of blacks better by “giving them
somebody else’s money…”
Surely Santorum, a self-styled scholar like Gingrich, knows that Dr.
Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated while in Memphis, TN fighting
for the rights of black workers – not blacks lazily wanting “somebody
else’s” money without working.
The GOP, during the elected tenures of surviving presidential
hopefuls Gingrich, Huntsman, Paul, Perry, Romney and Santorum,
persistently opposes equal opportunity measures for minorities often
employing the objectionable canard that all measures for remediating
institutional racism maliciously discriminate against whites.
The racist rhetoric emanating from the GOP presidential campaign will
increase without cease-&-desist demands from America’s body politic
– a needed but unlikely but action.
Linn Washington, Jr. is a founder of This Can’t Be Happening and a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion, forthcoming from AK Press. He lives in Philadelphia.
No comments:
Post a Comment