America's withdrawal has endangered Iraq's fragile democracy
11:00 AM EST, January 15, 2012
|
Regarding your recent article about the continuing violence in
Iraq, it's disturbing that it and many similar pieces all followed
President Obama's Dec. 2010 announcement that all American troops would
be withdrawn from Iraq by the end of 2011 ("Blasts targeting pilgrims
kill 15, injure 52 in Iraq," Jan.10).
It's quite obvious that the
president's action was nothing more than a political ploy to position
himself in a more favorable position for re-election in 2012.
Unfortunately, Mr. Obama's announcement also created the chaotic
situation the articles describe.
A substantial force should have
remained in Iraq until democracy there became more firmly entrenched. It
could have assisted in preventing a civil war and reduced the country's
vulnerability to radical forces such as al-Qaida and the Taliban as
well as Iran.
The removal of U.S. troops from Iraq has made it
impossible for the Iraqis to establish themselves as a successful model
of democracy for the world in general and for the Middle East in
particular. They were needed to protect the cause for which the
thousands of our troops made the ultimate sacrifice in the years since
the invasion.
Following earlier conflicts in which the U.S. has
been involved, we still have standing armies in Germany, Japan and South
Korea to lend support to our allies. If only the same could be said
regarding Iraq.
Perhaps some future U.S. president will be able to
work with the Iraqi government to establish a renewed role for the
American military there.
Quinton D. Thompson, Towson
Copyright © 2012, The Baltimore Sun
No comments:
Post a Comment